Edmund
Rolls; Neural Networks and Brain Function |
|
|
Book |
Page |
|
Topic |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
6 |
|
Different types of activation function (diagram) |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
7 |
|
A simple learning
rule that was originally presaged by Donald Hebb (1949) proposes that
synapses increase in strength when there is conjunctive presynaptic and
postsynaptic activity. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
7 |
|
Presynaptic
and postsynaptic
activity must be present approximately
simultaneously (to within perhaps 100-500 ms). |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
7 |
|
Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long
term depression (LTD) provide useful models of
some of the synaptic modifications that occur in the brain. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
8 |
|
Long-term potentiation (LTP) is the use-dependent and sustained increase in synaptic
strength that can be induced by brief periods of synaptic stimulation. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
8 |
|
LTP is long-lasting, in that its effect
can be measured for hours in hippocampal slices, and in chronic in vivo experiments in some cases
may last for months. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
8 |
|
LTP becomes
evident rapidly,
typically in less than one minute. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
11 |
|
Long term depression (LTD) can also occur. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
12 |
|
A sparse distributed representation is a
distributed representation in which a small
proportion of the neurons is active at any one time. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
13 |
|
One advantage distributed encoding is that the similarity between two representations can be reflected by the correlation between the two patterns of
activity. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
13 |
|
Another advantage is distributing encoding is that the number of different stimuli
that can be represented
can be very large. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
13 |
|
In the high-order
visual cortex in the temporal
lobe of primates, the
number of faces that
can be represented increases approximately
exponentially with the number
of neurons in the population. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
After mainly unimodal
processing stages, information processing streams converge into a number of areas, particularly the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
Convergence areas appear to be necessary for learning
to associate sensory stimuli with other reinforcing (rewarding or punishing) stimuli. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
The amygdala that is involved in learning
associations between the sight of food and its taste. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
Taste is a primary or innate reinforcer. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
The orbitofrontal
cortex is especially involved in rapidly relearning associations
when environmental contingencies change. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
19 |
|
In the orbitofrontal
cortex, association learning is also used to produce a representation of flavor, resulting from activation
by both olfactory and taste stimuli. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
22 |
|
Hippocampus receives inputs from both the 'what' and the 'where' systems. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
22 |
|
By rapidly learning
associations between conjunctive
inputs from the 'what' and the 'where' systems, the hippocampus is able to form memories of particular events occurring in particular places at particular times. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
24 |
|
Pattern association memory (diagram) |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
30 |
|
Graceful degradation or fault tolerance. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
36 |
|
With a pattern
associator, very little
will be retrieved if too
many associations are simultaneously
in storage and/or if too
little is provided as input. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
42 |
|
Autoassociative memories, or attractor neural networks, store memories,
each one of which is represented by a pattern of
neural activity. They can then recall the appropriate memory from
the network when provided with a fragment of
one of the memories. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
43 |
|
Architecture of an auto associative neural network (diagram) |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
46 |
|
Perhaps the most important and
useful property of autoassociative memories is that they complete an incomplete input vector,
allowing recall of a whole memory from a small fragment of it. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
46 |
|
The memory recalled in response to a fragment is that stored in the
memory that is closest in pattern similarity (as measured by
the dot product, or correlation). |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
46 |
|
The autoassociative
property at pattern
associative neural networks is very similar to the properties of human memory. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
56 |
|
Feature discovery by
self-organization. |
|
10 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
56 |
|
Each neuron
in a competitive network becomes activated by a set of consistently
coactive, that is correlated,
input axons, and gradually
learns to respond to that
cluster of coactive inputs. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
56 |
|
We can think of competitive networks as discovering features in the input space where features can be defined it is set of
consistently coactive inputs. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
56 |
|
Feature analyzers respond to correlations in the input space, and their learning occurs via self-organization in the competitive
network. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
62 |
|
Brain systems
in which competitive networks may be used for orthogonalization and sparsification. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
62 |
|
Removal of redundancy by competition is thought to be a key aspect of how sensory systems operate. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
63 |
|
Neurons
that respond to correlated combinations of their inputs can be described as feature analyzers. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
63 |
|
Neurons
that act is feature
analyzers perform useful preprocessing in many sensory systems. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
63 |
|
The power of competitive
networks in multistage
hierarchical processing is to build combinations of what is found in earliest stages
and thus effectively to build higher-order
representations. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
63 |
|
The consequences of sensory stimuli could be fed back to sensory systems to influence the categories formed. This could be one
function of the backprojections in the cerebral cortex. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
63 |
|
Inputs
would consist of forward inputs from a preceding cortical area, and backprojecting axons in the next cortical area, or from a structures as it is the amygdala to call hippocampus. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
65 |
|
Flavor
circuit diagram of taste input
and olfaction input. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
95 |
|
Hippocampus and Memory |
|
30 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
107 |
|
The hippocampus
receives, via the adjacent parahippocampal gyrus and entorhinal cortex inputs from virtually all association areas in the neocortex, including those in the parietal, temporal, and frontal lobes. |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
107 |
|
The hippocampus has available highly elaborated
multimodal information that has already been processed extensively along different, and partially interconnected, sensory pathways. |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
107 |
|
The provision of a single network for association between any subset of neurons (the CA3 neurons) may be an important feature of what the hippocampus circuitry provides for memory. |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
107 |
|
Additional inputs to the hippocampus come from the amygdala that and, via a separate pathway, from the cholinergic and other regulatory systems. |
|
|
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
108 |
|
To complement the massively convergent set of pathways into the hippocampus, there is a massively divergent set of backprojecting pathways from the hippocampus via the entorhinal cortex to the cerebral neocortical areas that
provide inputs to the hippocampus. |
|
13 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
108 |
|
Within the hippocampus, information is processed along a mainly unidirectional path, consisting of
three major stages. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
108 |
|
Axonal projections mainly from
layer 2 of entorhinal cortex
reach the granule cells
in the dentate gyrus
via the perforant path (PP), and also proceed to make synapses on the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells in the next stage,
CA3. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
108 |
|
A different set of fibers
projects from the entorhinal cortex (mainly layer 3) directly onto the third
processing stage, CA1. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
109 |
|
Connections within the
Hippocampus -- (diagram) |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
110 |
|
The extrinsic
axonal projections from CA3, the Schaffer collaterals, provide the major inputs to CA1
pyramidal cells. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
110 |
|
Information appears to be
funneled from the dentate gyrus (DG) through the CA3 bottleneck, and then spread out again into CA1. The output of CA1 returns directly, and via the subiculum, to the entorhinal cortex, from which it
is redistributed to neocortical areas. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
112 |
|
CA3 network as an autoassociative memory. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
118 |
|
The dentate
granule cell stage of
hippocampal
processing, which precedes
the CA3 stage, acts
to produce during learning, the sparse yet efficient (i.e. non-redundant) representation in CA3 neurons that is required for the autoassociation to perform well. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
120 |
|
CA3 autoassociation effect -- several arbitrary patterns of firing occur together on the CA3 neurons, and become associated together to form an episodic or 'whole scene' memory. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
120 |
|
The amount of information about each episode retrievable from CA3 has to be balanced against the number
of episodes that can be held concurrently in storage. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
120 |
|
The total
amount of information that can be stored and that
autoassociation memory
is approximately constant so that there must be a trade-off
between the number of
patterns stored and
the amount of information in each pattern. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
121 |
|
The CA1
network as a double
set of afferents, one set from the Schaffer collaterals coming from CA3, and a second set from the direct perforant path projections
from entorhinal cortex. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
121 |
|
The existence of the double set of inputs to CA1 appears to indicate that there
is a need for a system of projections that makes available, after the output of CA3, some information
closely related to that which was originally
given as input to the hippocampal
formation. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
122 |
|
The perforant
path projection may serve during retrieval to integrate the information-reduced description of
the full event recalled from CA3, with the information-richer
description of only those elements used as a cue provided by the entorhinal/perforant
path signal. This integration may be useful both in the consolidation of longer-term storage, and the immediate use of the retrieved memory. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
122 |
|
Backprojections to the neocortex, and recall from the hippocampus. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
124 |
|
Recall of
information from the hippocampus to the cerebral cortex. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
130 |
|
Widespread connectivity of the CA3 recurrent collaterals is important for good retrieval from incomplete
cues restricted to one part of the topographically organized inputs. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
136 |
|
Pattern Association in the Brain -- Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
138 |
|
Emotions
associated with different reinforcement
contingencies (diagram) |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
Bilateral damage to the amygdala that produces a deficit in
learning to associate visual and other stimuli with a primary (i.e. unlearned) reward or punishment. |
|
8 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
The amygdala is a subcortical region in the anterior part of the temporal lobe. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
Amygdala
receives massive projections from the visual and auditory temporal lobe cortex. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
Amygdala
receives inputs from
the inferior temporal
visual cortex, but not from earlier stages of cortical visual information processing. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
The amygdala also receives inputs that are potentially about primary
reinforcers, for example taste inputs (from the secondary taste cortex, via
connections from the orbitofrontal cortex to the amygdala). |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
The amygdala also receives somatosensory inputs, potentially about the rewarding or painful aspects of touch (from the somatosensory cortex via the insula). |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
146 |
|
Outputs of
the amygdala include
projections to the hypothalamus. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
151 |
|
The orbitofrontal
cortex is strongly
connected to the amygdala. |
|
5 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
153 |
|
Inputs to
the orbitofrontal cortex
include many of those required to determine whether a visual or auditory stimulus is associated with a primary
reinforcer such as taste or smell. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
154 |
|
The orbitofrontal
cortex is involved in the affective, reward-related, representation of touch. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
165 |
|
Cortical Networks for Invariant
Pattern Recognition |
|
11 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
177 |
|
There is considerable evidence
that the processing time
required in each cortical area for useful computation is of the order of 20-30 ms. |
|
12 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
177 |
|
It is unlikely that the processing time in each cortical area is sufficiently long for a stochastic
iterative process, or for temporal encoding and synchronization of multiple different populations of neurons. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
177 |
|
There must be useful information emanating from the first 15-20 ms of processing in each cortical area in the hierarchy. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
178 |
|
Learning to identify
new objects or images never seen before can occur very rapidly. Just a very few seconds of seeing a new
face or picture will enable us to recognize it later. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
Motor Systems -- Cerebellum and
Basal Ganglia |
|
11 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
The cerebellum has a remarkably a regular neural
network architecture. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
Basal ganglia
are of great interest because they are implicated
in motor habit learning,
might play a role in interfacing many cerebral cortical areas to systems for behavioral output, or at least in allowing some interaction
between different cortical systems competing for output, and because they have considerable regularity
in their structure. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
The cerebellum is involved in accurate control of movements. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
If the cerebellum is damaged, movements can still be initiated, but the movements are not
directed accurately at
the target, and frequently oscillate on the way to the target. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
There is insufficient
time during rapid
movements for feedback
control to operate, and the hypothesis is that
the cerebellum
performs feedforward control by learning to control the motor commands to the limbs and body in such a way that movements are smooth and precise. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
189 |
|
The cerebellum is a system for adaptive feedforward motor control. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
206 |
|
Basal ganglia
are parts of the brain that include the striatum, globus pallidus, substantia nigra, and subthalamic nucleus and are
necessary for normal initiation of movement. |
|
17 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
206 |
|
The basal ganglia receive inputs from all parts of the cerebral cortex,
including the motor cortex, and have outputs directed strongly toward the premotor and prefrontal cortex by which they
could influence movement initiation. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
206 |
|
The general
connectivity through the basal ganglia is for cortical or limbic inputs to reach the striatum, which then project to the globus
pallidus and substantia
nigra, which in turn project by the thalamus back to the cerebral cortex. Within this overall scheme, there are a set
of at least partially segregated parallel
processing streams. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
209 |
|
Damage to the striatum produces effects which
suggests that it is involved in orientation to
stimuli and to initiation
and control of movement. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
209 |
|
Lesions of the dopamine pathways that deplete the striatum of dopamine lead to a failure to orient to stimuli. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
209 |
|
In humans, depletion
of dopamine in the striatum is found in Parkinson's disease, in which
there is akinesia,
i.e. a lack of voluntary movement, bradykineaia, rigidity
and tremor. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
227 |
|
Cerebral Neocortex |
|
18 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
227 |
|
In addition to forward connections from one area to the next in the cerebral
neocortex, there also is many projections backwards to the preceding cortical area. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
227 |
|
The neocortex consists of many areas which can be distinguished by the appearance of the cells (cytoarchitecture) and the fibers of axons (myeloarchitecture), but nevertheless, the basic organization of the different neocortical areas has many similarities. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
227 |
|
Pyramidal cells with cell bodies in different
laminate of the cortex not only have different distributions of their dendrites, but also different distributions of their axons. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
The main information
bearing afferents to
a cortical area have
many terminals in layer
4.(By these afferents, we mean primarily those from the thalamus
or from the preceding cortical area. We do not mean the cortico-cortical back projections, nor the subcortical cholinergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, and serotoninergic inputs which are numerically minor, although they
are important in setting cortical cell thresholds,
excitability, and adaptation.) |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
In primary
sensory cortical areas there are spiny stellate cells in a rather expanded layer 4, and the thalamic terminals synapse onto the cells. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
Primary sensory cortical areas receive their inputs from the primary sensory thalamic
nucleus for a sensory
modality. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
Primate striate
cortex receives inputs from the lateral geniculate
nucleus, which in turn receives from the retinal ganglion cells. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
Spiny stellate cells are so-called but called they have radially
arranged, star-like dendrites. Their axons usually terminate within the cortical area
in which they are located. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
228 |
|
In addition to spiny stellate cell terminals,
there are some terminals
of thalamic afferents onto
pyramidal cells with cell bodies in layers 6 and 3, and also terminals
onto inhibitory interneurons such as basket cells, which thus provide for a feedforward
inhibition. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
232 |
|
Inhibitory cells and connections |
|
4 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
240 |
|
Neural processing could operate through a hierarchy of cortical stages. Convergence and competition are key aspects of the
system. |
|
8 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
240 |
|
Neurons in each cortical stage respond for 20-30 ms when an object can just be seen. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
240 |
|
The time
from V1 to inferior temporal cortex takes about 50 ms. There is insufficient
time for a return
projection from IT to
reach V1, influence processing there, and in turn
for V1 to project up to IT to alter processing there. Nevertheless, back
projections are a major
feature of cortical
connectivity. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
240 |
|
The amygdala and hippocampus are stages of information processing at which the different sensory modalities (such
as vision, hearing, touch, taste, and smell for the amygdala) are brought
together, so that
correlations between inputs in different modalities can be detected, but not at prior unimodal
cortical processing stages. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
During recall, neural activity does occur in cortical areas involved in the original processing. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Research has shown that when humans are asked to recall visual scenes in the dark, bloodflow is increased
in visual cortical areas,
stretching back from association cortical areas as far as early (possibly even primary) visual
cortical areas. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Recall is that function that could be produced by cortical back projections. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
There are many
NMDA receptors on the apical
dendrites of cortical
pyramidal cells, where the backprojection synapses terminate.
These receptors are implicated in associative
modifiability of synapses. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Plasticity
is very evident in the superficial layers of the cerebral cortex. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Backprojection synapses in ending on the apical dendrite, quite far from the cell body, might be
expected to be sufficient to dominate the cell
firing when there is no
forward input close to the cell body. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
When there is forward
input to the neuron, activating
synapses closer to the cell body than the backprojecting inputs, this would
tend to electrically shunt the effects received on the apical
dendrite. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
During the original
learning, the forward
input would have a stronger
effect on the activation
of the cell, with mild
guidance than being provided by the back projections. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
As an example of how recall could operate, consider the
situation in the visual system the sight of food is forward projected onto pyramidal cells and the higher order visual cortex, and conjunctively there is a backprojected representation of the
taste of the food
from, the amygdala to
or orbitofrontal cortex. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Neurons
that have conjunctive inputs from two stimuli set up representations of both, so that later if only one representation is back projected, then the visual neurons originally activated by the
sight of that food will be activated. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Using neurons with learned, conjunctive inputs, many other low-level details of the original visual stimulus might be recalled. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
243 |
|
Research has shown that during recall relatively early cortical
processing stages are activated in quite posterior visual areas for visual (but not auditory) scenes. The backprojections are probably
acting as pattern associators. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
Quantitative analysis of the recall that could be implemented
through the hippocampal back projections synapses to the neocortex, and then via multiple stages of corticocortical back
projections, make it clear that the most
important quantitative factor influencing the number
of memories that can be recalled is the number of back projecting synapses
onto each cortical neuron in the back projecting pathways. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
An interpretation of why there
are in general as many backprojecting synapses between two cortical areas as forward connections. The average number of a back
projections needs to be large to recall as many memories is
possible, but need not
be larger than the number
of forward inputs to each neuron, which
influences the number of possible classifications that each neuron can perform with its forward inputs. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
If backprojections are used for recall,
it would place severe constraints on their use for functions such as error
backpropagation. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
It will be difficult to use the backprojections in cortical architecture to convey an
appropriate error signal
from an output layer
back to the earlier layers if the backprojection synapses are also to be set up associatively to implement recall. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
Backprojection architecture could implement semantic priming by using backprojecting neurons to provide a small activation of just those neurons that are appropriate for responding to the semantic category of input stimulus. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
Attention
could operate from higher to lower levels, to selectively facilitate only certain pyramidal cells by using backprojections. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
244 |
|
Backprojections could produce many of the top-down
influences that are common in perception. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
245 |
|
There are a
number of different short-term memory systems,
each implemented in a different cortical area. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
245 |
|
The particular systems
considered here implements short-term
memory by subpopulations
of neurons that show maintained
activity in the delay, while a stimulus or event
is being remembered. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
246 |
|
The short-term
memories may operate as autoassociative attractor networks. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
246 |
|
Autoassociation could be implemented by associatively
modifiable synapses between connected pyramidal cells within
an area, or between adjacent cortical areas in a hierarchy. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
246 |
|
One
short-term memory system is in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, area 46. This is involved in remembering the locations of spatial responses. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
246 |
|
Another short-term
memory system is
implemented in the inferior temporal visual
cortex. This memory is for whether a particular visual stimulus (such as
the face) has been seen recently. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
247 |
|
Another short-term
memory system is
human auditory-verbal short-term memory, which appears to be implemented in the left hemisphere at the junction of the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
249 |
|
A sparse distributed representation is a
distributed representation in which a small
proportion of the neurons is active at any one time. |
|
2 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
249 |
|
One researcher suggested that 1000 active neurons (called
cardinal cells) might represent the whole of a visual scene. An important principle involved in forming
such a representation is a reduction of redundancy. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
250 |
|
In the higher
parts of the visual system in the temporal lobe visual cortical areas, there are neurons that are tuned to respond to faces. |
|
#REF! |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
253 |
|
An information
theory approach makes it clear that there is considerable information in distributed coding of temporal visual cortex neurons. |
|
3 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
259 |
|
The number
of stimuli encodable by the population of neurons might be
expected to rise exponentially as the number of neurons in the sample of the population is increased. |
|
6 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
260 |
|
Neurophysiological evidence demonstrates that the encoding is
distributed and the responses are sufficiently independent and reliable that the representational capacity
increases exponentially. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
260 |
|
Large numbers of stimuli and fine
discriminations between them can be represented without having to measure the activity of an enormous number of neurons. |
|
0 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
261 |
|
Capacity of representation rises exponentially with the number of neurons. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
262 |
|
Part of the biological
significance of exponential encoding capacity is that the receiving neuron or
neurons can obtain information about which one of a very large number stimuli is present by receiving the rate of
firing of relatively small numbers of inputs from each of the neuronal populations
from which it receives. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
263 |
|
The properties and representation of faces, and of olfactory and taste
stimuli, have been evident when the readout of
the information was by measuring the firing rate of neurons, typically over a 500 ms period. |
|
1 |
Rolls
& Treves; Neural Networks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|